GAME THEORETIC MODELS IN ENGINEERING DECISION MAKING
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Cooperative Game Theoretic Models for Decision-Making in Contexts of Library Cooperation1
This article starts, in Section 1, with a brief summary of Cooperative Economic Game Theory. It covers the following issues: (1) the nature of utility functions, (2) the representation of a decision problem in terms of utility functions, (3) the max-min solution of a decision problem, (4) the extension to multiple participants in the decision, (5) the context of nonzero-sum games, (6) cooperati...
متن کاملCooperative Game Theoretic Models for Decision-Making in Contexts of Library Cooperation1
THISARTICLE STARTS, I N SECTION1 , WITH A BRIEF SUMMARY of Cooperative Economic Game Theory. It covers the following issues: (1) the nature of utility functions, (2) the representation of a decision problem in terms of utility functions, (3) the ma-min solution of adecision problem, (4) the extension to multiple participants in the decision, (5) the context of nonzero-sum games, (6) cooperative...
متن کاملA Recurrent Neural Network for Game Theoretic Decision Making
We describe the properties of a connectionist network that is able to make decisions in strategic games. We use the structure of Bidirectional Associative Memory (BAM), a minimal two-layer recurrent neural network with binary activation functions and binary connection weights. We apply BAM to finite-strategy two-player games, and show that network activation in the long run is restricted to the...
متن کاملEvolutionary Game Theoretic Modeling of Decision Making and Culture
Title of dissertation: EVOLUTIONARY GAME THEORETIC MODELING OF DECISION MAKING AND CULTURE Patrick Roos, Doctor of Philosophy, 2012 Dissertation directed by: Dana Nau Department of Computer Science Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT) has become an attractive framework for modeling human behavior because it provides tools to explicitly model the dynamics of behaviors in populations over time and does...
متن کاملEnabling rational democratic decision-making with collective belief models and game theoretic analysis
We introduce a new approach to aggregating the beliefs and preferences of many individuals to form models for democratic decision-making. Traditional social choice functions used to aggregate beliefs and preferences attempt to find a single consensus model, but produce inconsistent results when a stalemate between opposing opinions occurs. Our approach combines the probabilistic beliefs of many...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu
سال: 1993
ISSN: 0289-7806,1882-7187
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.1993.470_1